Ethics guidelines in a widened context.

Exactly three years have passed since the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued a report entitled “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward.” Describing in detail the need for establishing enforceable standards and best practices, the document urged establishment of a federal National Institute of Forensic Science. Public responses from relevant professional organizations have varied considerably, with forensic psychiatry and psychology very far from ranking among the most prominent. There are good reasons for this relative absence of response. Despite its considerable length, the report makes only a single passing reference to forensic psychiatry. This inattention may well reflect the highly developed state of licensing, continuing education, fellowships and internships, and board certifications that presently characterize both forensic psychology and psychiatry. Also, annual scientific meetings regularly include significant presentations covering current advances and their practical applications including standards of performance. Members of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) also enjoy the benefits of an active and experienced Education Committee.